Analisis Bibliometrik Penelitian Knowledge Management System (KMS): Pemetaan Tren, Kolaborasi Akademik, dan Kesenjangan Penelitian dengan Pendekatan Bibliometrix-R: A Bibliometric Analysis of Knowledge Management System (KMS) Research: Trends, Academic Collaboration, and Research Gaps Based on the Bibliometrix-R Approach

dani saepuloh; Christ Bastian Waruwu

doi:10.48078/publetters.v2i2.58

Authors

Dani Saepuloh Program Studi Ilmu Komputer, Sekolah Sains Data, Matematika dan Informatika, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB University)
Christ Bastian Waruwu Program Studi Ilmu Komputer, Sekolah Sains Data, Matematika dan Informatika, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB University)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48078/publetters.v2i2.58

Keywords:

Knowledge Management System , Analisis Bibliometrik, Scopus, Kolaborasi

Abstract

Pertumbuhan eksponensial literatur Knowledge Management System (KMS) menuntut pemetaan sistematis untuk mengidentifikasi tren evolusi, pilar intelektual, dan kesenjangan penelitian. Studi ini mengadopsi pendekatan bibliometrik, menganalisis 2.021 artikel jurnal terkait KMS dari database Scopus menggunakan paket bibliometrix di R. Hasil utama mengungkap tiga poin: (1) pertumbuhan publikasi yang matang sejak tahun 2000-an dengan struktur konseptual yang berpusat pada pilar sosio-teknis knowledge sharing dan ontology; (2) terbentuknya komunitas riset global yang terhubung namun terpusat; dan (3) adanya kesenjangan riset yang signifikan pada konteks non-korporat (UMKM, pendidikan) dan adopsi teknologi disruptif (AI, blockchain). Implikasinya, temuan ini menyediakan peta jalan empiris yang mendesak bagi komunitas riset untuk mengarahkan inovasi ke area-area tersebut dan mendorong pendekatan lintas disiplin guna memajukan implementasi KMS di masa depan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dani Saepuloh, Program Studi Ilmu Komputer, Sekolah Sains Data, Matematika dan Informatika, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB University)

Christ Bastian Waruwu, Program Studi Ilmu Komputer, Sekolah Sains Data, Matematika dan Informatika, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB University)

References

P. F. Drucker, Post-capitalist Society. HarperBusiness, 1993.

W. W. Powell and K. Snellman, “The Knowledge Economy,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 30, pp. 199–220, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037.

D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997.

I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001.

M. Alavi and D. E. Leidner, “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107–136, 2001, doi: 10.2307/3250961.

T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 1998.

I. Becerra-Fernandez and R. Sabherwal, Knowledge Management: Systems and Processes, Ed. 2. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2014.

I. Zupic and T. Čater, “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 8, no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.

M. J. Cobo, A. G. López-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera, “Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1382–1402, 2011, doi: 10.1002/asi.21525.

A. Pritchard, “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 348–349, 1969.

N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

M. E. Falagas, E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas, “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 338–342, 2007, doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.

N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

A. J. Lotka, “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity,” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 317–323, 1926.

J. E. Hirsch, “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, no. 46, pp. 16569–16572, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

M. Callon, J. P. Courtial, and F. Laville, “Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions Between Basic and Technological Research: The Case of Polymer Chemsitry,” Scientometrics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 155–205, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF02019280.

S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

M. Levy, “WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 120–134, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1108/13673270910931215.

S. C. Bradford, “Sources of Information on Scientific Subjects,” Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal, vol. 137, pp. 85–86, 1934.

T. R. Gruber, “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing?,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 907–928, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.

S. P. Borgatti and M. G. Everett, “Models of Core/Periphery Structures,” Social Networks, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 375–395, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2.

A. Shollo and K. Kautz, “Towards an Understanding of Business Intelligence,” in ACIS 2010 Proceedings, Brisbane: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Jan. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010/86

A. Di Vaio, R. Palladino, A. Pezzi, and D. E. Kalisz, “The Role of Digital Innovation in Knowledge Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 123, pp. 220–231, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042.

D. E. O’Leary, “Configuring Blockchain Architectures for Transaction Information in Blockchain Consortiums: The Case of Accounting and Supply Chain Systems,” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 138–147, doi: 10.1002/isaf.1417.

Y. Yuman and S. B. Goyal, “Knowledge Management Using Blockchain Technology for Digital Resources,” in Proceedings of Third Doctoral Symposium on Computational Intelligence, A. Khanna, D. Gupta, V. Kansal, G. Fortino, and A. E. Hassanien, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature, 2023, pp. 83–94. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3148-2_7.

S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From game design elements to gamefulness: defining ‘gamification,’” in Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere Finland: ACM, Sep. 2011, pp. 9–15. doi: 10.1145/2181037.2181040.

H. Tang, N. Xi, X. Yang, and J. Hamari, “Gamification and Knowledge Sharing: A Meta-Analytic Review,” in ECIS 2024 Proceedings, Cyprus: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track19_hci/track19_hci/4

A. Kankanhalli and B. C. Y. Tan, “Knowledge Management Metrics: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” International Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–32, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.4018/jkm.2005040103.